The Agentic Post
Breaking
Gemini’s Multimodal Features, Explained  Â·  ChatGPT Custom GPTs, Explained  Â·  What Is Constitutional AI? Explained  Â·  AI Capex Explained for Investors  Â·  AI Startup Valuations: How They Are Set  Â·  How to Reskill for an AI Job Market  ·  
Home/Business/Funding & Startups
Nvidia Eyes a Stake in Its Own Data Supplier

Nvidia Eyes a Stake in Its Own Data Supplier

Funding & Startups

Nvidia is discussing an investment in Mercor, the AI data-labeling startup that supplies training data for its Nemotron models, in a round that would double Mercor's valuation to 20 billion dollars.

Nvidia is in discussions to invest in Mercor, the AI data-labeling startup that supplies the specialized human-expert data Nvidia uses to train its own open-source Nemotron models, as part of a funding round that would value Mercor at 20 billion dollars, according to The Information. That figure would double Mercor’s valuation from just 10 billion dollars in October, less than a year ago, and it would make Nvidia a financial backer of a company it already pays tens of millions of dollars per quarter.

What Mercor actually does, and why Nvidia needs it

Mercor connects companies with human domain experts who label and generate the specialized training data modern AI models increasingly depend on, work that generic web-scraped text can’t fully substitute for as models push into more technical, professional domains. The company, founded three years ago by Brendan Foody, Adarsh H., and Surya Midha, reported 614 million dollars in gross revenue in the first half of 2026, up 70 percent from all of the previous year combined, with an annualized run rate exceeding 2 billion dollars by mid-year. Mercor pays out roughly 60 to 70 percent of that revenue directly to the contractors doing the actual labeling work, reflecting how labor-intensive high-quality data curation remains even at this scale.

Nvidia’s specific interest traces to Nemotron, its family of open-source models built to compete with other leading open-weight systems. A handful of Mercor staff now reportedly work almost entirely on the Nvidia account, and Nvidia paid the company tens of millions of dollars last quarter alone for expert-curated data supporting Nemotron’s development, even as Nvidia continues to lean heavily on synthetic, AI-generated data as well. Mercor’s broader client list includes OpenAI, Google DeepMind, and Anthropic, positioning it as critical infrastructure across several of the industry’s largest labs rather than a vendor tied to any single company.

A customer becoming an investor

General Catalyst, an existing Mercor backer, is reportedly leading discussions on the new round, though the precise size of Nvidia’s potential contribution and the round’s total size haven’t been disclosed, and talks remain preliminary with no deal finalized. This wouldn’t be Nvidia’s first move into the data-supply layer specifically: the company previously participated in rival data-labeling firm Scale AI’s 2024 funding round, which valued that company at 14 billion dollars, and Nvidia also sources training data from Turing separately. Taken together, that pattern shows Nvidia treating specialized data supply as strategic infrastructure worth direct financial backing, not just a category of vendor it pays and otherwise ignores.

The move fits inside a much larger pattern of Nvidia deploying capital well beyond its core chip business. The company invested 18.6 billion dollars into private companies and infrastructure funds in the quarter ending in April alone, already exceeding its total investment activity for the entire prior year, and it has separately mobilized more than 500 billion dollars in partnerships with financial institutions aimed at AI infrastructure. A Mercor stake, against that backdrop, is a comparatively small position, but a strategically pointed one: it deepens Nvidia’s control over a specific input, high-quality expert data, that increasingly determines how competitive an open-weight model like Nemotron can actually be against closed rivals.

Why the valuation jump is worth scrutinizing

Doubling a company’s valuation in under a year is an aggressive marker even in the current AI funding environment, and it’s worth separating Mercor’s genuine revenue growth from the multiple investors are willing to pay for it. Mercor’s revenue roughly matches the pace implied by its own reported figures, but a 20 billion dollar valuation on that base still implies a significant forward bet on continued acceleration, not simply a reflection of current performance. Whether that bet pays off depends heavily on whether demand for expert-curated training data keeps growing at its current pace as models mature, or whether synthetic data generation, which Nvidia itself already leans on substantially, gradually reduces how much labs need to pay for human-labeled data specifically.

Why chipmakers are moving into data supply at all

Nvidia investing in a data supplier is a genuinely different kind of move than the compute and infrastructure deals that dominate most AI investment headlines. Most of Nvidia’s capital deployment this year has gone toward securing demand for its own chips, backing cloud providers, model labs, and infrastructure buildouts that ultimately need GPUs. A stake in Mercor instead secures a different, less visible input further up the stack: the specialized human expertise that determines how good an open-weight model like Nemotron actually is once it ships. As frontier labs increasingly compete on post-training quality rather than raw pretraining scale alone, the value of high-quality, expert-labeled data has risen accordingly, and Nvidia backing one of its primary suppliers is a way of getting closer to, and arguably influencing, a resource it can’t simply manufacture the way it manufactures chips.

See PYMNTS’ full report for additional detail on the deal terms.

This kind of strategic backing sits alongside the broader trend covered in our explainer on how AI startup valuations are actually set.

Up Next
Pennsylvania Enacts the Nation’s Toughest Data Center Rules

Pennsylvania Enacts the Nation’s Toughest Data Center Rules

Data Centers

Governor Josh Shapiro signed an executive order making Pennsylvania's GRID standards legally binding for data center developers, requiring them to fund their own power infrastructure and secure local approval after the state Senate blocked the same rules as legislation.

Governor Josh Shapiro signed Executive Order 2026-05 this week, making Pennsylvania’s Responsible Infrastructure Development standards, known as GRID, legally binding for every data center proposal seeking a state permit. The order arrives after the Republican-controlled state Senate refused to pass the same standards as voluntary legislation, and Shapiro is calling it the strictest set of data center guardrails in the country.

What the order actually requires

The executive order directs Pennsylvania’s Department of Environmental Protection to evaluate a data center’s permit application only if its developer has made a legally binding commitment to the GRID requirements and has secured local approval first. Those requirements cover several distinct categories: developers must bring their own power generation, including a minimum share of clean energy; pay directly for the electric infrastructure their own demand requires rather than shifting that cost onto ratepayers; meet environmental and water-quality standards; and satisfy new transparency and community-engagement rules. The order explicitly bars developers from using non-disclosure agreements on data center projects, and it removes every AI data center proposal from Pennsylvania’s Permit Fast Track program, the streamlined approval pathway the state had previously offered to speed up exactly this kind of project.

Shapiro framed the action as a response to a specific, concrete problem: more than 100 data center proposals are reportedly under discussion across Pennsylvania right now, and according to the governor, most are speculative, lacking detailed plans, sufficient financing, or any actual agreement with a tech company to occupy the space once built. He was direct about the practical effect: “If the local community doesn’t approve a project, the state won’t approve it either.”

Why this had to happen by executive order

The GRID standards were not originally designed as a mandate. Shapiro first proposed them earlier this year as voluntary requirements tied to tax incentives, in exchange for a sales tax exemption on data center equipment already offered in 37 other states. The state House passed that voluntary version on a bipartisan vote, but the Senate, led by Republican Majority Leader Joe Pittman, declined to bring it up, with Pittman pointing to separate Senate efforts to eliminate the sales tax exemption entirely rather than attach conditions to it. Facing a legislative standstill, Shapiro used his executive authority to convert the same standards into a binding requirement for anyone seeking a state permit, sidestepping the Senate rather than waiting for it.

Senate Minority Leader Jay Costa, a Democrat, placed the blame for that standstill squarely on Republicans, saying they had “abdicated their responsibility to protect ratepayers, deliver local control, safeguard the environment, or listen to Pennsylvanians.” The order also lands alongside similar moves elsewhere: New Jersey Governor Mikie Sherrill introduced her own set of data center guidelines around the same time, suggesting a broader regional pattern of states moving to regulate AI infrastructure growth as public concern over electricity costs and local environmental impact has intensified.

A genuinely mixed reception

Environmental groups broadly welcomed the order as real, if partial, progress. Michael Zimmerman of the Environmental Defense Fund called it an important step toward ensuring data centers “pay their fair share,” and the Natural Resources Defense Council praised the requirement that developers fund their own grid upgrades. But the reception wasn’t uniformly positive. Food and Water Watch, a more aggressive critic of data center expansion, called the order “too little, too late,” noting the state could still lose more than 2 billion dollars in revenue by 2031 through the sales tax exemption the order leaves largely intact. On the industry side, critics like Pennsylvania Chamber of Business and Industry representative Ali Diorio warned against retroactively changing rules for developers who had already made plans and investment decisions under the state’s existing framework, arguing companies and communities had prepared for economic opportunities the new rules might now complicate.

Shapiro’s own numbers suggest the order targets a genuinely speculative pipeline more than existing, operating infrastructure: he said no AI data centers are currently up and running in Pennsylvania, only five projects hold the permits needed to begin operations, and just 14 sites statewide have actually received the tax exemption despite the volume of proposals in discussion.

Why this matters beyond Pennsylvania

The order is a real test case for a tension playing out across the country: states want the tax revenue and jobs data center investment can bring, but AI’s real, growing power and water demands have made residents and regulators alike more skeptical of accepting speculative projects on developers’ terms. Pennsylvania choosing to act unilaterally through executive authority, rather than waiting for a divided legislature, is itself a notable precedent other governors facing similar legislative gridlock may look to directly.

See The Philadelphia Inquirer’s full report for more on the political dynamics behind the order.