Using an AI coding assistant well is closer to pair programming with a capable but new colleague than to using an autocomplete tool, and treating it that way changes how you should work with it.
Stating your intent before diving into implementation, “I want to refactor this to separate the validation logic,” gives the assistant the same context a human pair would want, and produces more aligned suggestions than jumping straight to code.
A human pair expects to be told when a suggestion doesn’t fit. Treat AI suggestions the same way, correcting and redirecting rather than either accepting everything or dismissing the tool after one bad suggestion.
Ask for two or three different approaches with tradeoffs explained instead of accepting the first suggestion. Mirrors how a good human pairing session actually works, weighing real alternatives rather than committing to the first idea.
Our full guide to reviewing AI agent code covers this directly: fluent-looking code isn’t automatically correct code, and the review habits that make human pairing effective apply just as much here. See GitHub’s own Copilot documentation.




